Good grief! It’s been six months since I lasted posted. Well so what, I’ve had other things to do, I don’t do it for a living and I only write when I can think of something to say. But, hey, if I’m going to have a blog I might as well try to keep up with it.
To be honest, one of the things on my mind had been a bad case of cognitive dissonance following the UK referendum on EU membership last June. I’m still struggling to come to terms with the result – and the result of the US election hasn’t helped. And I’m writing this just before the result of the first round of the French Presidential election, so heaven help us.
One of the things which emerged from the US election has been the concept of ‘fake news’. I’ve found quite a useful ‘debunking handbook’ about how to address myths.* That cheered me up a bit but then I realised that it’s very hard to change people’s minds about anything because they tend to wrap themselves in information (true or false) supporting their views and surround themselves with like-minded friends and colleagues. Now, I read a newspaper which takes the same view on the referendum result as me, my three kids, several friends and a group of former work colleagues I go walking with all agree with me. My wife (and her ex-husband) take the opposite view but her three kids agree with me.
So am I surrounding myself with like-minded opinions and avoiding the contrary views? Am I failing my scientific training which demands I take only evidence-based decisions? I have been spending a lot of time and brain power on this and I still am holding fast. If anything, the thing which has had the biggest impact on me is the depth of hostility expressed by the supporters of the result of the referendum against those who dare to question it. And I still think that referendums are a crap way of deciding anything.
A different, but related, experience has been reading Yuval Noah Harari’s two books Sapiens and Homo Deus. I’m about 2/3 of the way through the second. He has an amazing insight: you don’t always agree with him but he makes you think about things – pure brain candy. Homo Deus – A Brief History of Tomorrow is perhaps the most challenging. He argues that there is nothing special about humans (which I have long believed), that there is no such thing as a soul (again, which I have no argument with) but also – and I need to do some re-reading and thinking here – that there is no such thing as free will. If I understand the argument, any decisions we make – the high road or the low road, fight or flight – are ultimately decided by the purely random firing of some neurone in our brains.
I think I could accept that when it comes to the instant of the decision but surely there is a whole load of life experience stored up in our brains which provides a context to any decision. Surely, someone who has spent their whole life exploring and seeking out new and difficult experiences won’t suddenly take a low road rather than a high one just because of some random electrical event in their brain?
But that’s not to criticise Harari’s books. They are brilliant and I would recommend them to anyone.
* Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S. (2011), The Debunking Handbook. St. Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland. November 5. ISBN 978-0-646-56812-6. [http://sks.to/debunk]